Tresor

Tresor vs Copilot

AI assistants are everywhere — but not all of them are built for sensitive data. This page offers an objective comparison so you can choose what fits your team best.

Quick Comparison

Key differences at a glance.

Data Privacy

Tresor
EU-only secure enclaves, end-to-end encryption, customer-held keys
Copilot
Processed on vendor-managed cloud; policies and keys vendor-controlled

Compliance

Tresor
GDPR/HIPAA alignment, audit-ready logs
Copilot
Compliance posture depends on tenant and configuration; vendor-managed

Customization

Tresor
Confidential AI Assistant + Secure AI Memory (private knowledge)
Copilot
Productivity assistant integrated across suites and tools

Use Cases

Tresor
Regulated industries and sensitive data
Copilot
Broad productivity within office suites

Control

Tresor
Full control over keys and retention
Copilot
Policies governed by vendor and tenant settings

Strengths of Copilot

Where a suite-integrated assistant shines.
  • Deep suite integration
    Works across documents, mail, and productivity tools.
  • Familiar UX
    Fits into existing enterprise workflows.
  • General productivity
    Great for drafting, summarizing, and meeting notes.

Where Tresor Stands Out

Built for privacy-first teams handling sensitive data.
  • Confidential by design
    Zero-access architecture with encrypted processing and memory.
  • EU-sovereign
    All data processed in European secure enclaves (CPU/GPU TEEs).
  • Compliance-first
    Audit-ready logs; GDPR/HIPAA alignment for regulated teams.
  • Customer-held keys
    You own the keys — govern access and retention end to end.

Who It's Best For

Pick the right tool for the job.
Choose Copilot if…
You want AI within a productivity suite for non-sensitive content and collaboration.
Choose Tresor if…
You handle sensitive data in regulated industries and need sovereignty, compliance, and key ownership.

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers about Tresor and our Zero-Access approach.