Tresor

Tresor vs Lumo

AI assistants are everywhere — but not all of them are built for sensitive data. This page offers an objective comparison so you can choose what fits your team best.

Quick Comparison

Key differences at a glance.

Data Privacy

Tresor
EU-only secure enclaves, end-to-end encryption, customer-held keys
Lumo
Vendor-managed infrastructure; policies and storage are vendor-controlled

Compliance

Tresor
GDPR/HIPAA alignment, audit-ready logs
Lumo
Compliance posture depends on product tier and configuration

Customization

Tresor
Confidential AI Assistant + Secure AI Memory (private knowledge)
Lumo
General-purpose assistant features with ecosystem ties

Use Cases

Tresor
Regulated industries and sensitive data
Lumo
Broad assistant use across teams

Control

Tresor
Full control over keys and retention
Lumo
Policies governed by vendor

Strengths of Lumo

Where a general-purpose assistant shines.
  • Ease of adoption
    Simple onboarding for non-sensitive use cases.
  • Integrations
    Fits with common productivity tools and workflows.
  • General assistance
    Good for everyday prompts and content help.

Where Tresor Stands Out

Built for privacy-first teams handling sensitive data.
  • Confidential by design
    Zero-access architecture with encrypted processing and memory.
  • EU-sovereign
    All data processed in European secure enclaves (CPU/GPU TEEs).
  • Compliance-first
    Audit-ready logs; GDPR/HIPAA alignment for regulated teams.
  • Customer-held keys
    You own the keys — govern access and retention end to end.

Who It's Best For

Pick the right tool for the job.
Choose Lumo if…
You need a general assistant for non-sensitive work and want quick setup.
Choose Tresor if…
You handle sensitive data in regulated industries and need sovereignty, compliance, and key ownership.

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers about Tresor and our Zero-Access approach.